I agree on the bio-weapon. A few billion people might disagree on the transhumanism and maybe they have a point?
Maybe it's about the unintended and unforseen consequences.
Consider.. if your an IoT cyborg, how do you entrust yourself to securely custody your bitcoin?
You say it's a bio-weapon but a few billion people got the bio-weapon and according to them it wasn't a bio-weapon so a few billion people maybe they have a point? You see my point.
Transhumanism is not the problem. The problem is who has control over the technology. You are probably heard of transhumanism through the globalists and listened to what they want to do with it which is control humanity.
If someone good that has good intentions with the technology then the technology can be used for good.
