Absolute mathematical scarcity is something, no shirtcoin will ever have. That's why you hate to see Bitcoiners even mentioning it.

The link is relevant, it has a message for you. Without #Bitcoin any shirtcoin is just a dust.

Do you want to use a shirtcoin, use it. But stop pretending it is better than #Bitcoin. It isn't. If it was, you would be 100% in it.

Monero is a tool, like is #LN or the dollar. I suggested you use LN between BTC on chain and XMR. Instead of a thank you, you started shitting on everything like a true shill.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's just software bro, it's not some law of physics. If consensus changes in the future, especially as mining security decreases because of falling block rewards, even "absolute mathematical scarcity" can change. Several Bitcoin Developers, including Peter Todd, are open to tail emission in Bitcoins future.

"Could Bitcoin Add Tail Emission?"

https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary

Speaking of dust, the more popular Bitcoin becomes, the larger the dust limit grows, ironically!

Only facts here. Monero IS better when it comes to cheap, simple, and private transactions. Better digital cash. Sorry if that upsets you so much. Find a healthier way to deal with it. Better historical store of value? Bitcoin wins.

I didn't ask for your suggestions. And no one will with your bad attitude. You just inserted yourself into this conversation and were hostile from the start. LN is an overly complex dumpster fire, with half-ass "privacy", and garbage UX. Even it's creators agree with me! So take your suggestions and kindly GFY!

So you're a #Bitcoin security budget expert now too? Because Peter is talking about tail emission, it doesn't mean it will happen. Bitcoin will always be more secure than the shirtcoin of yours has right now.

Yes please, GFY retard 🤙💜