its a fair question and probably the first one that needs answering.
Core is the reference implementation and either
developing a clear governence model
or breaking it up into smaller groups with clear roles and responsibilities would be the logical first step I think.
What is this canonical "Core", exactly? What public resource are you referring to? Do you have a URL or content-addressable hash or something else?
Do you mean the repo I git-cloned years ago from who-even-knows-where and made small, backwards-compatible changes to? Is that "Core"?
yawn
ok
we lack shared context for a conversation 👋
That's the whole point of the conversation thus far - to agree on what particular terms mean.
What do you consider "Bitcoin Core" to be? I would imagine you can supply a link, no?
