Not necessarily.

Bitcoin is open-source.

This is a walk-in-the-park, day-to-day for open-source.

Projects make decisions that many users and maintainers dislike - So they fork.

This is NOT an issue, unless you're running the software fork you DISAGREE with.

I'm old enough to remember Odell leading an anti-Saylor campaign when Saylor discouraged ETFs from donating to the devs. Core devs shit all over node runners ability to censor spam and Odell just cracks jokes from the peripheral. Odd.

the core devs are treating Bitcoin users like iphone users. that's the problem. taking options away from Bitcoin is an attack on Bitcoin. telling people what is good for them is an attack. none of this has to do with ossification or Saylors opinions.

Filterors already have their own fork.

Let's simply do the basics security and compatibility upgrades. Everything else can be done on L2 or L3.

I'm shocked changes were made unilaterally and now the project needs to fork. That's the only thing anyone should be angry about, the devs are behaving like toddlers