They lied about all those things and moon expeditions, but that doesn't make the Earth flat.
I have zero trust in our experts, but the hypothesis about the shape of the planets and stars are much older than our shitty fiat gov.
Discussion
The heliocentric model went main stream around the time the Rothschilds established what would become central banking
Yes, of courseβ¦the JEWSπ€‘
...Were evicted from many nations over the last centuries and earned a dismal collective reputation. Why?
A very large part of this can be explained by a very much higher mean IQ in among especially jews of east European descent compared to for example the general population of Germany or Sweden. The higher IQ leads to more success in trades that demand higher IQ for higher success. Just take a look at Nobel prize winners of natural sciencesπ€·
Other trades like banking, cultural disciplines etc will also bring a disproportionate amount of Jews to it. And the most successful of the criminal minds will also have a disproportionate amount of jews because of this. It is all a function of higher mean IQ, not a conspiracy.
The reaction from the majority society will always be that of envy and scape goating.
Well the old Hebrew texts teach that the world is flat. Who am i to disagree?
I have a question, how does water stick to a sphere traveling 450,000 miles per hour and spinning at 1000 miles per hour?
How does the sun stay together and not dissapate into the sky?
What? You are answering my question with a question? π
Yes. Both questions get at the same thing.
Why do things, like fire and water, stick to planets and stars instead of being diffused into space itself?
The current consensus view is grabity, no?
The same gravity that is strong enough to hold the ocean to the surface but weak enough for me to jump 2 feet in the air Or a butterfly to migrate and fly 3000 miles every year? That is some magical gravity π
The consensus view seemd to be that mass is key in understanding how gravity interacts with physical objects. Light extends from energy sources (the sun), ultimately inflicting the physics on objects in our local universe. The same is thought to happen in every universe. E = MC2.
https://www.quora.com/How-is-gravity-related-in-the-equation-E-mc-2?share=1
Then explain clouds. It can weigh up to 1 million pounds and floats in the air π
Evaporation, pressure, precipitation.
I understand how cloud forms but why wonβt it crash to earth when it weights 1 Million pounds and your magical gravity is pulling on it? π
Yes. Your scientific mind is truly impressive. So intelligent of you to see through all of the bullshit about
βGravityβ..obviously itβs a scamπ€·
No I am simply questioning his assertion that gravity works on mass, why wouldnβt it work on clouds that weigh 1 million pounds? If you donβt know just say you donβt know. No shame in that π
Consider how a kettle boils off water by heating it up, transforming it into a gaseous state which diffuses it's mass, changing how it interacts with gravity.
As the water cools, it will tranform from gas to liquid, again undergoing changes in mass and subsequent behavioral change under gravity. The result in condensation.
Heavy clouds are full of gas which get released when that gas state changes into liquid. The process of clouds raining is the same as condensation.
I'm going to stop replying to this thread because this Hans guy is being hysterical and destroying any earnest conversation that could be had.
I look forward to future discourse with you guys on a future thread. Now that I've blocked Hans he shouldn't see the next one.
Good read
No. Clouds is full of water droplets not gas π
Water droplets, not dense enough to form a liquid, also known as gas
The droplets are dispersed throughout the cloud, and when they come together the result is precipitation.
Therefor, the droplets do not weigh tonnes until they come together, for they are disbersed across the gaseous container of the cloud.
Gravity is a theory. Happens to be widely accepted. But a theory nonetheless.
The If the ocean had legs it wouldnβt have any problems to stand up. But it is a fluid and hasnβt got any and obeys the same gravity as the fluid in you, that follows the motions of your body.
When you die, Your muscles donβt function any more and cannot elevate your body from the couch. And the fluid in your body is returned into the ocean. π€‘
What? π Try spinning a ball and put some water on it, why wonβt it stick to the ball? That is a simple question.
Because as you pointed out, gravity is an extremely WEAK force that has to gather ENOURMOUS amounts of matter just to keep us from falling off the earth. The mass in a spinning ball has next to none gravitational pull, but the spinn of the same ball creates a centripetal force way beyond that. What are you talking about?!?!?
The earth is spinning 1000 miles / hour and that is not enough force to force it off the surface and yet clouds that weighs 1 million pounds can float in the air? Ok then π
lmao none of your βok thenβ accounted for or provided any verifiable evidence that shows that the earth is not a spinning globe
But Iβll give you a solid 6/10
No. That is not enough centripetal force in comparison with the gravitational pull of a whole planet. You know that the Earth makes ONE cirkulation/24 hours, no?