I do not believe that I said anything in this thread in opposition to your points above.

As you have said, I would be in support of any policy that enables people to be less dependent on the state.

I guess the only place where we may disagree is that I believe that there will always be a group of people who do not have support, who can’t provide for themselves, and the generosity of other people would not suffice.

I believe in supporting these people, and believe our institutions and government still has a role to play in this. I agree with the sentiment that it should be as small as possible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Then we are in agreement. I agree with what you’re saying, it’s unfair and immoral to suspend welfare for political opponents and I would prefer institutions at least pretend to have some objectivity.

I suppose the only thing which even made me engage was the comparison to the Trucker convoy. Withholding charity is not theft, even if the results can be just as damaging. Confiscating funds from bank accounts is theft.