I think there was a misunderstanding because I didnt phase it correctly. I’m not saying we should Zap podcasts. I’m saying Damus/Fountain integration is another way to fund your V4V wallet. Fountain is still respecting the splits.
Unless a Zap respects the 'value block' splits, it is not helping podcasting 2.0
The whole idea of keeping developers and services in the 'value flow' breaks with single recipient zaps.
Please rad up on the value block here: https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/blob/main/docs/1.0.md#value #[0]
Discussion
Sh, sure. That makes total sense
Just a thought but would love your take on it. Podcasters to split the income with the guests for a particular episode. Not sure if it is possible.
We've has this working for 2 years with value block splits. Guests get a wallet at @getalby
Nice did not know that will check it out. #awesome
I've received sats for being a guest on Podcasting 2.0. Months ago. We've had the whole system going 2 years.
Yep, already works. It’s part of the spec. If you’ve ever boosted a podcast, chances are you boosted a guest at the same time.