Unless a Zap respects the 'value block' splits, it is not helping podcasting 2.0

The whole idea of keeping developers and services in the 'value flow' breaks with single recipient zaps.

Please rad up on the value block here: https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/blob/main/docs/1.0.md#value #[0]

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

LOL

I wish there was a way I could automatically set v4v when zapping.

Imagine if you will the ability to zap 420 sats, and of that...

- 5% goes to viewer/clientapp being used to view the content being zapped

- 1% goes to each relay the zap published through

- remainder to target being zapped

The only way I see this happening is if the client app acts as an intermediary on the LN invoice and forward it based on the split

#[0]

I think what he means is all the sats he gets from zaps on Nostr on his notes go directly into his fountain wallet, and from there in the fountain app he boosts podcasts. This means the value will be split accordingly.

This is what’s going on. Get Zaps on Nostr and then use those sats in Fountain to support podcasters.

I do the same

Im surprised a nostr client hasnt developed with its own custodial wallet like fountain that could easily facilitate splits defined by the content producer. Maybe a custodial solution wouldnt even be necessary...🤔

#[5]​ has a wallet

And #[6]​ has started to integrate lnd with lnc & lndhub

Seems like he’s misreading what’s being communicated here, simply that someone is able to collect sats on nostr to trickle out automatically whilst playing through a podcast on fountain.

I think some relays might implement something similar as a micro pay to relay model with Payment Intervals, which would be very cool for pay to read relays, but using fountain as a zap enabled ln wallet (for receiving as a listener to pay out to creators) doesnt effect fountains implementation of The "podcast:value" Specification.

I think there was a misunderstanding because I didnt phase it correctly. I’m not saying we should Zap podcasts. I’m saying Damus/Fountain integration is another way to fund your V4V wallet. Fountain is still respecting the splits.

Sh, sure. That makes total sense

Just a thought but would love your take on it. Podcasters to split the income with the guests for a particular episode. Not sure if it is possible.

We've has this working for 2 years with value block splits. Guests get a wallet at @getalby

Nice did not know that will check it out. #awesome

I've received sats for being a guest on Podcasting 2.0. Months ago. We've had the whole system going 2 years.

Yep, already works. It’s part of the spec. If you’ve ever boosted a podcast, chances are you boosted a guest at the same time.