Im surprised a nostr client hasnt developed with its own custodial wallet like fountain that could easily facilitate splits defined by the content producer. Maybe a custodial solution wouldnt even be necessary...🤔
Unless a Zap respects the 'value block' splits, it is not helping podcasting 2.0
The whole idea of keeping developers and services in the 'value flow' breaks with single recipient zaps.
Please rad up on the value block here: https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/blob/main/docs/1.0.md#value #[0]
Discussion
#[5]​ has a wallet
And #[6]​ has started to integrate lnd with lnc & lndhub
Seems like he’s misreading what’s being communicated here, simply that someone is able to collect sats on nostr to trickle out automatically whilst playing through a podcast on fountain.
I think some relays might implement something similar as a micro pay to relay model with Payment Intervals, which would be very cool for pay to read relays, but using fountain as a zap enabled ln wallet (for receiving as a listener to pay out to creators) doesnt effect fountains implementation of The "podcast:value" Specification.