Nostr Web Client

No it's a good concern. I hear nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7cnjvghxjme0qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcqyr7at68k4cxms9a7pdca5gzf3svqd95d3fj9j4vuyj0nyta8x3j2whad7ya is funded by nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyehwumn8ghj7mnhvvh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7ctewe4xcetfd3khsvrpdsmk5vnsw96rydr3v4jrz73hvyu8xqpqsg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q8dzj6n , who has some sus takes. Hopefully more help and competition will come out of the woodwork.

Optimistic Pessimist ⚡ 6mo ago 💬 1

Hence the tradeoff to run btc knots is too high for anyone.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Anchorite 6mo ago 💬 1

lol no, why do you say that? Knots is open source, go check it yourself just like Core. It has eyes on it.

Meanwhile, we know 100% that Core is malicious. Easy choice.

Optimistic Pessimist ⚡ 6mo ago

Umm, if I extend you thought

I migrate to Knots version 29 for example. Because I felt it is good and correct from what I can test.

Now lukejr does something that is malicious ( for example, not saying he will do) and now I get stuck basically on version 29 and keep running it. Thus having no upgrade possibilities.

If I have to stay on the same version 29, I would choose BTC core and stay there.

Saying that a group of large contributed project is 100% malicious and a single person project is never exposed to have malicious intend would be incorrect imo.

But in any case, run whatever you want. It is your hardware. I am fortunate that I can read and understand the changes on these repo and can make a conscious decision on it.