Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

As much as I think this is a useful development for a lot of people, especially in the developing world - it’s also a huge banner for regulators that says “CHECK HOW OBVIOUSLY MONEY TRANSMITTING WE ARE!”

If Lightning is left to only bitcoin, I think it can be more easily argued that it is separate and unique in construction and should also be in the regulatory framework. But if it’s being used to move dollars around, I think we lose a massive edge in maintaining that perception. All they will see is a dollar payment network where they cannot see into all of the accounts, can’t KYC every user, and can’t freeze the payments. And they will do everything they can to gain that level of control, and far worse likely, if they have such a clear target. nostr:note1c7y74c0zc0w0njarysn59ep9agda2e6r568xfu20s6w7px0rllsqtk3yc7

Avatar
Melchizedek 1y ago

Maybe our legislature can stop twiddling their thumbs and actually provide some regulatory clarity around stablecoins that would actually differentiate the assets.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.