What's wrong with you? What makes you think they are a honey pot? What - other than being open source and transparent - would you want to see to stop attacking them on every post?
Discussion
The posts would have to stop showing up on my screen, or they would have to stop being a honeypot (promising privacy they won't/can't actually provide, to entrap people)
Which privacy promises are not being provided?
They literally imply it "is private."
It's an app.
Why did you just make me explain that? It's like 5+5
They say Telegram is not private, yet it is (to a certain threshold) and Signal is private which I would assume is their benchmark. Are you claiming it's less private than Signal? What can others learn about your whitenoise chat what they can't learn about your Signal Chat?
Anyone can learn anything about any chat happening on any smartphone unless you've verified every circuit in every chip on the phone and every circuit in every satellite and every circuit in every government lab to ensure none of the circuits in any of the government labs or satellites are able to wirelessly receive screenshots of everything you do from circuits in your device
Time for your pills?
Most wallet apps claim to be the most secure, probably because clients search for "the most secure". What do you want to do about that?
I don't do pills
"The most secure" is iffy. It's fine if it's just the creator's actual opinion, but I can't think of a time I've seen a really good wallet app where the creator bothered to brag about it
ROFL
Downloading an app gets you:
* 0% of the way to verifying what every circuit in your phone does
* 0% of the way to verifying what every circuit in every satellite does
* 0% of the way to verifying what every circuit in every lab does
But the marketing implies the provided privacy percentage is:
100%
Got it. Nirvana fallacy much.
Nope
Lying to users isn't a good solution to user security. I'm not shooting down a good idea by saying that, I'm just correct.
And it's perfectly possible to address user security in better ways than lying. For example, we already discussed the possibility of making a similar app without lying about it.
Or is the definition Google just showed me not what you meant? I'm not familiar with this
You're getting hung up on marketing slogans that would be violated if the OS spied on the user which it might well be doing but you shit on this project for not acknowledging it might be doing this? Come on, get real.
No u, unironically
I'm not lying, how am I the one that's supposed to "get real?"
Are you stupid?
Modern cryptography makes is possible to send data from A to B through insecure channels. You don't have to trust the middelman. What does the circuit in a satellite can do to change that?
I'm not stupid, your question is
You don't know if there are satellites capable of identifying every image your GPU displays, based on signal it emits
You don't even know if the phone transmits images itself
And nothing wrong with me has any relevance here, you're replying to me doing the right thing