I'm thinking big enough. You're the one focusing within the limits of your own ecosystem. Tokenisation of an asset means nothing if you have to rely on external authority to enforce it.
Another example; you own the NFT that stipulates ownership of a rare pair of Nike air Jordans. But someone broke into your apartment and stole the shoes last week.
What value does the NFT have now?
That NFT is proof of ownership of the shoes are recovered.
Your examples shows you’re a retard too.
I’d say thanks for playing but you just wasted everyone’s time.
Your Arby’s shift is about to start, you better get going.
Wow. Do you often resort to name calling to convince yourself you're winning a losing argument?
You said it yourself: The NFT has a use in the single edge case "IF" the shoes are recovered. And still you're appealing to an external authority to enforce it. But good luck finding a pair of sneakers.
I must be retarded to think someone spitting such idiotic takes could zoom out enough to see their own fallacy. Have fun staying poor.
You’re back?
That was one long Arby’s shift.
Get some rest.
