I don’t really have a method. I tend to intentionally seek out sources of information that challenge what I think, though. I probably spend more time reading the arguments *against* what I believe, and the arguments I make, than reading the arguments of people who agree with me.

How that approach turns into internet searches, I don’t really know. I haven’t tried to systematize my approach to information discovery in any way that would be terribly exciting to talk about. It would probably be best described as disorganized and scatterbrained, and some internal socratic dialogues from time to time, trying to convince myself I’m wrong about what I think, through imagining counterfactuals, and trying to identify what would have to be true for me to be wrong, or some haphazard positivist construction like that. That being said, I’m not a strict positivist.