History lessons are great

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Adam Smith writes about the history of currency debasement in The Wealth of Nations. 🤓

Explain

"In the progress of industry, commercial nations have found it convenient to coin several different metals into money; gold for larger payments, silver for purchases of moderate value, and copper, or some other coarse metal, for those of still smaller consideration, They have always, however, considered one of those metals as more peculiarly the measure of value than any of the other two; and this preference seems generally to have been given to the metal which they happen first to make use of as the instrument of commerce. Having once begun to use it as their standard, which they must have done when they had no other money, they have generally continued to do so even when the necessity was not the same. The Romans are said to have had nothing but copper money till within five years before the first Punic war (Pliny, lib. xxxiii. cap. 3), when they first began to coin silver. Copper, therefore, appears to have continued always the measure of value in that republic. At Rome all accounts appear to have been kept, and the value of all estates to have been computed, either in asses or in sestertii. The as was always the denomination of a copper coin. The word sestertius signifies two asses and a half. Though the sestertius, therefore, was originally a silver coin, its value was estimated in copper. At Rome, one who owed a great deal of money was said to have a great deal of other people's copper."

That’s worth a f’n zap

If only Damus iOS wasn’t cucked

I’m so sad about the state of lightning

You absolutely came through!!

Thank you so much.

Amethyst is cucked too

And I’m not using Primal only to give Apple its 30% split…

Ok jk I’m using #primal now

But duck buying sats thru it

History lessons that most people have yet to learn!

Now to just smack some sense into no coiners lol

Love this chart!!

https://timelineofmoney.com for a more comprehensive timeline on money and money adjacent history.

The jump from 4k to 16k in this chart is not "money printing" just change in definition of M1. M0 is FED balance sheet. M1 is M0+some other stuff. M2 is M1+some other stuff and supposes to be all the normal money in circulation.

(There was also M3 which was supposed to be M2+other stuff = all the money for real, but I heard FED gave up on that as bankers are pretty creative in money creation :D. )

You can see that M2 did not jump that much on that day (hence just definition change).

Better comparison to the roman situation would be "total public debt"

?g=1xo4h

This actually shows you the future as all public debt comes due some time and will have to be repayed (with even more debt usually..)