I did, and it was all a bunch of pseudoscience trying to prove one biased point
Discussion
That's pseudoscience?
Are you familiar with things that are called capacitors?
And PWA, and all other tech that is involved ? Yes, what you linked is one sided and does not mention all the variables
It does mention it
That is what I am saying, a biased point of view. Cheap shit fails, capacitors fail too, and not in a way the article talks in, again only one failure mode to highlight the point that author is trying to drive
A failure is not what is described here
Read the #1
#2 and #3 are failures yes. It's all in the 2 pictures I've linked directly here.
I did, no point of me trying to explain anything when you are set in your opinion. I merely tried to highlight facts
Look if you read this and think this is pseudoscience I'm not the one that is set on his opinion.
I did, and I am apparently not doing a good job at explaining things so I’ll 🤐
Oh but I swear the problem is not you having difficulty explaining things but rather not making any attempt to refute the claim that LED lights flicker at about 100 times per second because the AC power supply (50 Hz) crosses zero voltage twice each cycle, and capacitors in LED drivers try to smooth this out but never completely succeed.
Actually, since an LED (light emitting diode) only allows current in one direction the flicker rate would be half of what this person suggested. Much closer to the natural human frequencies, brain waves, Gamma waves, high-level cognition, 30–100 Hz. Heartbeat, 60-70 times a minute, etc. I don’t know if this is coincidence, human nature expressing itself subliminally or an intentional disruption. Regardless of the circumstances, it is well documented that non-natural light is disruptive to our bodies in various ways.