Who else is using NIP-98 HTTP Auth? nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr nostr:npub137c5pd8gmhhe0njtsgwjgunc5xjr2vmzvglkgqs5sjeh972gqqxqjak37w nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You mean server side or client side?

Both.

Amethyst does, NostrDVM does, too

NIP98 is probably anyone who support Nostr authoritarian headers. Nostr.build for sure, and I think all who do any nip-96

I love how you call them authoritarian headers.

Ok, autocomplete fucked me over! Authorization headers πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜‚

fuck authority. im against this nip now. πŸ˜‚

Ffs! The best NIP so far (in my book) πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜‚

Authoritarians would agree.

Fucking typos! β€œLeave authoritarian headers alone” πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ€£πŸ˜­πŸ˜­πŸ˜­

πŸ–οΈ

We do in nsec.app and npub.pro and more coming. Just read nip46 PR to SN - looks like SN is/will be using nip98 too.

I think ditto uses too

I use it for zap.stream API and a bunch of other places

I'm pleasantly surprised by how nice it is.

That's nice to hear, i wrote that NIP :)

Good man! πŸ‘ it’s deceptively simple but gives you everything you need to run a modern auth’ed api.

I've used it but I can't recall for what

No zaps for you!

🀘

Amethyst i think

damus uses it extensively when authing with our purple api and nostr build

also for authing with our push notification server to update settings

Nice. Yeah I’m using it on an nsecbunker style client and api I’m building that allows for team collaboration with permissions and policies for sharing access to keys.

It’s been surprisingly simple to keep everything scoped and locked down.