So you see,
if *you* want to ban abortions - meanwhile calling me a bad person for *not wanting to ban* people from consensually entering into an agreement - well you're trying to force me to engage on your behalf.
If you want to ban anyone from doing anything consensual - you're a kind of pseudo-fascist.
Want to ban guns? Same deal.
So back to your question;
Libertarians don't get any privilege in view outside of the idea of consent between two willing parties.
If you force me to engage in the act, you're encroaching on my ability to consent or volunteer.
This is the base layer of society we're talking about - not specific opinions.
Of which I can practice and discuss with you no problem!
But they're my 1nak not something I'm willing to shove down your throat & label you a heretic for not complying.
You said “You can be any of those things in private, but bringing it to the Bitcoin party is a foul.” And then just said you’re open to discussing different opinions. So I am confused by your original point.
Yeah bro, have you been paying attention?
People are attacking en masse others with differing opinions - essentially Doxxing them.
Harassing them in ways that maximalise their views to an extent where it's shoving it down people's throats maliciously.
Calling people murderers, heretics, etc...
People are acting like it's the "same energy as Bitcoin maximalism"...
^^^^ ITS NOT.
Was not aware of all that
