If the right to bear arms is surrendered by people like you, your kids might wish you were shot in the face.
Discussion
Adam troll? I'm a human being, you can speak to me
My question still stands, why do you want to help criminals terrorize people by demanding that the police disarm all potential victims?
Excuse.me, what? Please explain
You saying youre a human being, and your negligence of the presented argument, only leads me to believe youre less than a troll and indeed are a bot.
Lol
What chance does someone who is disabled have in a conflict with a strong able bodied attacker?
What chance does a young girl living or walking alone on campus have against a bigger stronger man?
In most situations the stronger person will win. Except when guns are involved. Guns are equalizers. A young girl who is all alone with her gun or a person in a wheelchair with a gun can be just as deadly as any man with a gun. Beyond having the ability to aim & pull the trigger, muscles don't matter.
What people like you support is disarming the weak. It appears (to any sane person) that you prefer to help the criminals. You want people to be terrorized & raped & stolen from.
Criminals don't obey laws. Any idiot can see that. And there are many ways to illegally acquire a gun. It's also quite easy to 3d print them or to make one from materials readily available at any hardware store.
When you support a law that disarms people, you are creating an environment in which only criminals have guns. And good people are in much weaker positions against attackers of all kinds. People who advocate "gun control" are making the world a scarier & more dangerous place for good people.
you only need to look at rape epidemic in Europe where they disarmed the population then imported millions of young African men who came alone ( didn't bring their women ), can't get a date because they're broke, so they just rape White European women. the police do nothing because they are afraid of being labeled racist.
I knew a wheelchair bound woman that couldn't handle much firearm, but her .22LR pistol was far superior to being a victim.
Guns to physical violence is nostr to publishing speech and bitcoin is to financial exclusivity (banks). The three are all anti-tyranny freedom tech.
Perhaps we shouldn't have people attacking disabled people in the first place (an incredibly tiny number and insignificant reference point that demonstrates your lack of standing)
So women & disabled people are insignificant... sure, that's a great way to deal with your cognitive dissonance
I guess if rape & murder & theft are wrong we should just stop those things by making them illegal 🤔
I can make up scenarios too! What if a giraffe with an Uzi duck taped to him breaks into a daycare center for left handed children with communist leanings? How do we stop the giraffes? Why won't anyone think of the communist left handed infants?
So there are no disabled people in the world?
And there are no women living alone, walking to their cars alone, men aren't physically stronger, & criminals don't break gun laws?
I wouldn’t bother at this point.
Software dev in presumably the nice part of Philly (where the policies voted for don’t affect them). Watching John Wick is provably the closest this guy has been to a firearm.
Self defense is a goofy martial arts class and if we all just vote harder and get the right autocrats in we’ll usher in a utopia.
The blatant refusal to think is just astonishing sometimes.
No one is that stupid.
Criminals in Europe have access to guns. There are strict gun laws. There are NOT daily mass shootings. My point is simply that reducing the number of guns will affect the third statement. Nobody is advocating for helping criminals.
US doesn't have daily mass shootings either, and has a larger population than Europe
*European countries, not Europe as a whole obviously
They are pulling numbers from a place that will literally count a man defending his home from criminals as a mass shooting. The efforts to spread lies & twist numbers are amazing.