One coin maintains forward and backwards privacy by default.

and one doesn't.

You are either lying to us, or to yourself.

Either way its misinformation that some peoples lives depend on.

Get your shit together.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Can you tell me who Satoshi is? Since Bitcoin is so bad for privacy?

What does anonymity have to do with privacy? Maybe learn the difference. Satoshis is anonymous but his transactions are completely public.

https://nostrcheck.me/media/af740d198babb8c7b82d0a4718eb354bb3f6af9a98639b85d4a5cf1371caba85/90ea5272b3c03ba24be742349416c2b104f10d8956181a41c31bd524c9f5ff12.webp

Thanks for making my argument for me. Anonymity is superior to privacy.

"...Since Bitcoin is so bad for privacy?"

Your whole claim was that Bitcoin is private. It's not.

Now you're switching up your argument to anonymity (Bitcoin isn't even truly anonymous, it's weakly pseudonymous). A blockchain that is anonymous AND private would be ideal for OPSEC. Lack of privacy weakens your ability to stay anonymous.

Not if you're doing OPSEC right... Which was my whole point

Even pros can and do fuck up OPSEC. Bitcoin just introduces extra ways to fuck up that are not possible with Monero (like amount analysis and address correlation)