How about this:
“The Grapevine lets you pick the people, who pick the people, who pick the people, who curate your content, facts, and information.”
Discussion
Warmer, but why do I want randos to pick anything for me? ;) Doesn't address why this is a good thing.
The problem is that it’s getting harder and harder to know what sources of information (eg news sources) and recommendations (eg product or business recommendations) to trust, so the idea is that they’re not randos if you get to pick them. And picking the people who pick the people who pick the people gives you a wider net.
So how do I say this without it sounding like randos?
Maybe “picking people” is too vague — it means to endorse someone as good (or bad) at some thing in some context. Alice may endorse Bob to rate comedies but not dramas.
I think this is closer. Friends of friends, trusted friends of trusted friends… something along these lines.
How do I offload the work of curating expertise without wholesale losing control?