Replying to Avatar Nela

#GN

🥳

https://www.wired.com/story/deepseek-ai-china-privacy-data/

——————

“I don’t want to really scare you, but it was alarming how many people I talked to who are highly placed people in AI who have retreats that are sort of ‘bug out’ houses, to which they could flee if it all hits the fan.”

—James Barrat, author of Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era

Taking a Nostr break . 👋🏽

hope your break was rejuvenating

very necessary as a practice generally

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, you are right. I've been only working on my laptop and been too much online in the last few weeks. I've also noticed that I need time to find my standpoint, I actually don’t have a opinion on everything that's happening in techbuiz and news. I'm missing in-depth discussions on AI topics, for example. Let's see what's being discussed here.

Today I went to a wheelchair basketball game of a very talented comedian buddy, who has been in his rollchair since he was a child.

I've rarely seen anything more elegant than this man, who was practically one with his transport technology and scored one goal after another. Impressive and something to muse over.

Had to rest with this a moment. That’s a nice example and image of your friend—and others—in the merging of body, craft (in two senses) and imagination for his transformed potential and grace 💜

Would love to hear some of your musings.

Some candid associations that came up, it makes me think about all our technological prosthetics in a more human sense. How I feel extended in craft and medium, how they unlock interactive and time based mediums and process. Do I dream through them? New tech prosthetics have created new [day] dreams for me, it’s why I use them after all; maybe night dreams too? I’m not as sure about that, but maybe in some archetypal way

On cue, in a rudimentary way nostr was part of my dream last night, lol. I was struggling to crop a photo on my device to add to a note. The photo was of an intriguing staircase from the interior of a middle eastern restaurant where I was staying as a guest with family friends. The finished interior and occupants would only appear by some kind of esoteric revealing technique or spell.

not in any way as inspiring or elegant of an example as your friend; such a worthy benchmark for how one spends time with one’s tech

Love to share my musings with you later …🐌 #sunday :)

Working on it, going to be a longer piece.

Fractured musings on Tech, Humanity,

AI / 1 (the dark edit:))

* Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Does AI dream of humans or of being human?

* Jules Verne – I devoured his books as a child, dreaming myself into his world. Captain Nemo in his "Nautilus" - my ideal father figure. As the first author to center scientific and technological processes in his novels, he depicts a world where people live in peace and respect within a technological adventure. Technology is employed as an extension of human capability – but above all, to protect the human essence. Tech optimism as a shaping influence.

* "Paris in the Twentieth Century" - the tragic struggle of an idealistic young man for happiness within a relentlessly materialistic dystopia that the French capital has become by 1960. Jules Verne's last book, published posthumously in 1994.

* Mastering a prosthesis requires dealing with loss. My Friend in the wheelchair serves as a teacher, showing us that growth is multidimensional, and that real beauty is decouplet from standarts. How do the not constrained, handle losses: the loss of privacy, the loss of faith in liberal democracy, the loss of a naïve, utopian worldview amidst concerns for the future ? („Be more resillient!“)

* Belief in technology and AI presupposes a deterministic tech optimism

* I see a disappearance of our motivation to shape our future. Do we leave it to Technocrats to define how our world will look in the future?

* Extremism fills the void created by a lack of education – obsessive AI usage through their Fallibility can fuel new forms of extremism.

* The changing significance of technology: from industrial techniques that standardize to a technological postmodernity that reaches for singularity – the special, the spectacle, even. What remains still special for us today?

* Democracy cherishes the individual, while in a dictatorship, the individual is irrelevant. Does the same apply to technocracy?

* Technocrats want to reduce bureaucracy, but replace Huamans with *merciless AI pedants.

Thank you for sharing these thoughts. I will sit with them awhile.

nostr:npub1pvgcusxk7006hvtlyx555erhq8c5pk9svw57snlxujpkgnkup89sekdx8c I would like to invite you to chat a little ..

Which in-depth AI topics are you missing?

..not just topics, I figured, but how we process information. Everybody has questions beside some specs, I got lots of questions, but who to ask ? I got a glimpse now… but if you search for AI and studies, you will find more sales arguments than empirical studies. I am thinking about what AI was built for..💰

If feel we should have honest discussions with free sociologists, psychologists and spiritual people. Maybe AI topics could be something for the next Nostr Conference.

Yes most #ai discussions have been technical economical and political.

I think it’s overrated for what it is now and concerns are about what it means for humanity in the future. But at end of day it’s a tool. It will eliminate jobs and further confuse and divide us further. I’m excited about ai open source development that have blown up every where.

Yes, I agree with you in principle. Sometimes I have to laugh when I try out an AI chat. In the end, I write my text contextually much more clearly when I don't use AI.

The "AI Act", a European regulation, discusses whether AI systems in critical infrastructures should be viewed as high-risk systems. Hmm. Funneling it in everywhere and discussing it afterwards ☺️

What is clear is that our way of thinking will change quickly. I am sure that I too will use AI for monotonous jobs, I hate nothing more than monotony. And of course, everything is better in open source. But we act as if we have the growth of AI under control.

This is not about a few thousand jobs being lost, but about the Mariana Trench between people, about new standards of human efficiency that are becoming tough. The growing inequality is determined by what people do instead of a monotonous job that AI is now taking over.

You sound btw, as if you have already accepted the fate of mankind ☺️