you'd think that an actual use case for personal GPT models for such a thing would be compelling...
most people don't really express new thoughts that often, and a GPT definitely can encompass most people's vocabulary and idiom pretty easily
but no, apparently it has to be carefully cultivated text models based on approved sources so that nobody gets offended by someone else's speech
just another aspect of the wrongheadedness of the current AI hype train
if it was about funding stuff people actually want, i could have composed this post in about 50 taps