We are going in circles. You cannot just change the meaning of words. If we are talking about something voluntary, we are talking about a donation, not a tax. In which case I agree with you, government should be funded 100% voluntarily. If we are talking about mandatory taxation, you cannot use the word voluntary. Either use the words in ways that make sense, or we cannot have a rational discussion. Saying nonsense and then linking long form articles that do not explain what you are saying is not a rational discussion.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

read it

nevent1qqs2w63rqllzxl6lvxwjkcdfxx9u7wf2g9ypp7u7gdesvfmstnxnj7cpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5xg4stc

I did. It describes a system of taxation where you choose how much tax to pay, and then you are forced to sell your property. if you choose not to pay you lose your property.

Doesnโ€™t sound voluntary to me.

How is this enforced? Via the violence of the state?

new INTERPOL

No thanks but good luck to you and your taxes. I will continue to advocate for voluntarism.

i advocate for voluntaryism

voluntaryism

You are confused. You want โ€œvoluntaryismโ€ enforced by mandatory taxation, property confiscation, an international police force, and state violence.

NO

voluntaryism =

natural rights. equality. non-coercion. non-aggression

nevent1qqs8u9t7cy3n0fgp4gv0gmtydvy4c5z8chee5uqsx7u9kmahan5a2vcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9ws9hkdqa