There is no Red.
There is no Blue.
There is the State.
And there is you.
There are no coincidences.
Do you sincerely believe that it was happenstance that 2 summers in a row, open air political events, had an assassination attempt and an assassination?
You can grieve someone’s passing, without contributing to nonsensical noise, that you can’t verify.
heads-up: we looked for a lightning address on your profile but could not find one... u can get a free one at https://rizful.com ... and then reply back to this comment so we can zap you.
The verified information is as follows.
Shooters name was Tyler Robinson. He lived with his transgender lover lance twiggs. He was a leftist from a family of conservatives. He wrote hey facist catch on the bullet and made transgender references on another bullet. Family members have stated he was full of hate and spewing hate regarding Kirk coming to the uvu campus. Robinson was known to be a “too online” gamer by high school classmates.
He was a leftist pure and simple. Just like I stated.
Ah yes, the shooters high school friend, as reported by good ole Anna Bates. Come on bro. Get your mind right.
All your words about left right mean nothing in the grand scheme of things.
There is no Red. There is no Blue. There is the State. And there is you.
The socialists on both sides want to kill you dude and they’re seeking to acquire state power. It’s more complicated than poems.
I wish it were. His private security was shit. Begs the question why. 3 open sight lines in a 4 panel tent? Idk man.
Seems like they over-prioritized crowd control at the expense of area surveillance which turned out to be a fatal mistake, but in their defense people don’t often assassinate non politicians.
You really consider FBI released information as ‘verified’? The FBI isn’t exactly know for releasing true information about their cases, see the head scratching detective work done on Las Vegas shooting for example.
Where else am I supposed to get info about recent political assasinations, from the tooth fairy?
I know your dunking but nostr:nprofile1qqsy4m4qn4069fya2ensrk3lsc2rle2rnum30j07dmly98rmvyafkpgpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcy97f7k is good
yeah that account had a perfect summary of what I've seen going around. I copy it below for others:
"The individual spotted on top of the roof before the shooting (the person who appears to have been the actual shooter) might not have been the actual shooter either. The exceptionally graphic video evidence of the attack might be playing tricks on the eyes; the wound that was visible in the video evidence so far may have in actuality been an exit wound for a shot that came from Kirk's 4 o' clock position. Some video evidence supports this, however much higher quality footage (such as from the professional media equipment recording the rally) will be necessary to determine if that is a viable line of investigative effort.
Again, focusing on details that can help find the killer and eliminate future threats is worth the speculation, especially as the FBI has stated that they recovered the rifle used to conduct the attack from a wooded treeline near the campus. This rifle appears to have sported an optic which was mounted too far too the rear to provide a feasible shooting platform. This detail has caused many to doubt that this rifle was the one used in the shooting (as in, it's yet another decoy), or that the shooter did not have the experience to know that the scope was in the wrong position for it to be used properly. In short: If this rifle was used, the suspect is either of a very small body type (much smaller than the suspects sought so far), or they are now sporting a facial wound caused by the recoil of the firearm driving the scope into their face. Or, this rifle was not used at all, and whomever staged it did not have the forethought to position the scope correctly.
As with most high-profile events like this, some discrepancy among the initial details is very much expected. However, there is a LOT of debate right now regarding whether or not the murder of Charlie Kirk was a professional assassination. Right now, all of the evidence in the public eye suggests that Kirk could have been killed in a more coordinated manner (as in more than one person might have been involved), but also by someone displaying very amateur tradecraft. On the other hand, if the multiple misdirections were deliberately planted to confuse and slow down investigative efforts, this would be a strong indicator of more organized planning.
Sometimes the most likely explanation is the simplest, and based on the sheer number of people celebrating his murder the chances of this being one of the usual suspects is rather high, even though the door must remain open to other possibilities. The cold hard truth right now is that regardless of how Kirk was killed, he was killed for a reason. And right now there are millions of people celebrating his murder, both online and in the real world. It is this important observation that will have lasting impact for some time, both in terms of societal shift, but also in terms of real-world threats and security concerns."
Certainly can get info from them but any conclusions drawn from their info I take with a lot of salt. My faith in US Government bureaucracy is at an all time low. The FBI is so heavily politicized that I might trust the tooth fairy more.
