GM
Custodial zap processors are an attack on Bitcoin.
NIP-05 service providers are an attack on Nostr.
Discussion
Edgy
🤣
The latter is fixed with btcpay NIP05 plugin?
How are you faring with this, @#[2]?
1.7M sats bounty for this. I'll do it if nobody started yet.
Context: https://github.com/btcpayserver/btcpayserver/discussions/4642#discussioncomment-4975164
I'll throw in 400k sats
Just wait until someone implements a custodial NIP-05 zap provider on top of Ordinals
What does it even mean? :)
Have the reveal transaction commit to the npub with a reference to the custodial service and use the transaction id hash as the username in the nostr.json stored on the blockchain as a jpeg with a QR code embedded in it referencing back to the nostr identity.
Can you explain a bit further please Mutatrum is it the centralised effect (rug pull, data harvesting) here?