Avatar
Theo Hague
18c7a0cbb8eaf58d20c7b9c7414ab2ad2ea43f4801c3f5bcc11751543fd418ee
Publishing books. Freedom, Bitcoin. Voluntarist. Learning to code. English/Dutch

Nice suit nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8spramhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmndv9uxjmtpd35hxarn9ehkumrfdejsz9thwden5te0v4jx2m3wdehhxarj9ekxzmnytjq0jg

Replying to Avatar Mike Hobart

Today a number of worlds came crashing together at supersonic speed for most, but not for those of you that have read my piece ā€œThe Grand Scheme?ā€ There is a relatively high likelihood that you have heard about the Cybertruck ā€œbombingā€ that occurred out front of Trump Tower in Las Vegas, Nevada. Let’s go over a few of the datapoints:

- Matt Livelsberger was a Green Beret Team Sergeant

- He is the supposed deceased individual in the driver’s seat of the Cybertruck that immolated in front of Trump Tower

- The DNA of the body was obtained by a family member, NOT collected from the body itself, and the body was so scorched it wasn’t identifiable*

- The Cybertruck detonated with fireworks*, not professional quality IEDs or VBIDs as GB’s are trained to have expertise in recognizing as well as relying upon

- The deceased had a Desert Eagle with the body, with a gunshot wound to the head*

- Livelsberger’s Army ID and Passport were found within the truck, intact, and legible*

There’s already a ton of weirdness in the above information. Things continue to get weird.

Matt had contacted Sam Shoemate (@samosaur on Twitter), CW2 intelligence officer (US Army, Ret.), with the email below.

Shawn Ryan recorded an emergency podcast to brief about this situation, with Shoemate in attendance as guest. Which can be found here.

Thanks to my exploits with my Bitcoin Veterans organization and peers, and particularly because of my loud mouth and clear addiction to Twitter, I am graced with some very, very interesting and impressive connections that I consider to be great friends. We have been discussing this situation all day. There is a lot that does not add up here. A highly trained, and clearly successful GB blowing up a bulletproof truck with fireworks does not make sense to be a botched terror attack. This man would have had the capability to make a very effective (and non-defective) ordinance to accomplish significant damage to a soft target like a hotel in Las Vegas.

Then said individual also, supposedly, deletes himself with a .50 round to the head from a Desert Eagle that was present in the truck. Why the Desert Eagle… why the flare.

The Email

Now the meat on this is what was stated in the email sent to Shoemate. Livelsberger suggests that what we’ve been seeing of the drones situation on the East Coast has been craft of Chinese origins that are running operational gravitic propulsion systems. Stating that China and the US are the only elements on the planet that have the technological capabilities for such craft (wrong, Russia has them as well). That these craft have been launching from submarines for years. And that they have been used for SIGINT and ISR deployments.

This sounds like science fiction to the majority. But I assure you, it most certainly is not.

MH370

In order to get to where we’re going we must first take a quick step backwards. This situation ties right back into a thread that one of my favorite Twitter accounts has been tugging on for over a year now. In March of 2014 a Boeing 777 sent out a distress call stating that the aircraft was ā€œdisintegratingā€ and that the pilots were heading for an emergency landing. A few hours later the aircraft vanished.

Ashton Forbes is a name that should be household by now. He has single handedly pushed the MH370 flight back into the forefront of social attention. Why? MH370 disappeared under… interesting circumstances, and Ashton dug up some interesting videos. We’re not here to talk about the entire topic (it’s very, VERY dense) but if you are uninformed on MH370 go here.

How this ties into Livelsberger is the mention of electrogravitics in his email. Twitter is ablaze right now with claims that the topic is ā€œmental illnessā€ or how Shoemate put with Shawn Ryan; science fiction.

Or that because the email mentions so many hot button topics that it’s clearly fake.

What if I were to tell you that not only are electrogravitics not fake, but they are real, even operational currently, as Livelsberger is attempting to reveal in his email. Going so far as to say that the technologies are patented.

Lt Col Tom Bearden

We also have work that has been highlighted by the likes of Ashton Forbes, as well as Dr. Steven Greer, coming from the likes of one Lt Col Thomas Bearden, US Army.

These technologies are real. They have been for decades. And they have been hidden from us, The People for a very long time.

While part of me agrees that this technology should not be getting hidden another part of me feels that it’s for the best at our current state. I also have to share the very real risks of such technologies, and why Matt Livelsberger claimed that these technologies as being used by China and the US were a Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) scenario.

Imagine a craft that were to be successfully utilizing these technologies and theories. Our current grappling with physics should suggest that these capabilities are nothing but magic or of pure science fiction. But what do we know about advance technology and it appearing to be magic?

So, what if it is real? Something that can manipulate gravity can effectively cancel out the effects of gravity. Meaning? You can potentially create a bubble around your person, or craft, that is not impacted by the forces of gravity. You are not limited by the material that is absconded with gravitational forces. Atmosphere.

You would therefore not be limited by such forces as aerodynamics, drag, turbulence etc. You could also use this technology to move the very same through water. Not being limited by the physical forces that encumber such crafts as our maritime vessels and submarines.

Now, things get really, really weird (as if they aren’t already) thanks to our friend Lt Col Bearden. Below he discusses the capabilities of using such understanding of this science and physics to be capable of manipulating 4th dimensional energy (4DE) — what Nikola Tesla referred to as ā€œAetherā€ — to be capable of using 4DE for such devices as directed energy weapons (DEWs) that could truly vaporize matter or, as Ashton Forbes puts, accumulate matter. Even at a distance.

These devices/craft can be capable of traveling 100s-1000s of miles per second without experiencing g-forces and can traverse through water as freely as air. Essentially ā€œblinkingā€ from space to feet from ground/sea level. Like we saw with the Tic-Tac event. That’s why in the email he says they are such a MAD risk.

Think about it, they could be loaded with ordinance in China, or Russia, or Syria, or where-have-you, blink to anywhere in the US (or the world) in a few seconds, release ordinance, blink out before detonation, reload, and repeat…

Electrogravitics is real. It’s time to wake up.

--------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for reading. As a supplement to this writing I have provided patents to a number of technologies that involve manipulation of gravity, and electromagnetics (aka electrogravitics being the combined focus) in my substack at the link below:

https://justhearmeout.substack.com/p/livelsberger-shawn-ryan-electrogravitics

GM nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy

We published a small book about these ideas a couple of years ago. I found it interesting, but it hasn't gotten a lot of attention since. Might be something for you?

https://bitcoinbook.shop/products/bitcoin-technics-and-time

Attended a funeral today. Thet found brain cancer in 2022. Hard not to think about covid jabs, but I kept quiet.

GM nostr! Summer vacation is finally over. Time to get some work done.

Replying to Avatar waxwing

Imagine that the ownership of a utxo could be traded directly - ignore, for a moment, that you can't trade ownership with private keys, ignore trading costs etc. etc., not because those issues don't exist, but because I want to focus on the economic calculus outside of it.

Now this question is only interesting if the utxo is somehow encumbered, and ignoring general covenants, let's focus specifically on timelocked utxos (which is in fact a primitive covenant).

So concretely, imagine 1 BTC which is timelocked for 1 year, and imagine you could somehow freely trade it. What would its market value be?

Note that this is *not* similar to traditional put/call options, because we are not talking about the *option* to buy something, but about directly trading it. So it seems to be the same contract as a future (except not requiring a court to enforce!). You're buying the thing (in this case "a" bitcoin), but not able to do anything with it until 1 year expires. Is that worth more or less than 1BTC today?

In normal futures markets, there is another factor to consider: the base currency in which the "commodity" is being priced. So nobody talks about the price of a futures contract on a barrel of oil, measured in barrels of oil, they only talk about it measured in USD. For that case, we have "normal" curves where the further out into the future you go, the more it costs to buy such a contract, because you are hedging risk of volatility and you pay a premium for that, and then you have inverted or "backwardated" curves where it's actually cheaper to buy well into the future, because of competing factors like storage costs and others.

We could try to apply that logic to trading bitcoin/usd futures and indeed, they exist! So people do exactly that. But I'm thinking of the price of the contract in BTC. It seems obvious that the price of 1 BTC in 1 year is less than 1BTC today, because the buyer forgoes the *option* to use the money in the meantime, for anything else, including productive investment. That discount is sometimes called the "time value of money". So you could imagine some formula like 1 BTC - r*1year*1BTC where r is some vague idea of a riskless interest rate.

That's all very kind of "standard" thinking but I am not sure if it's the real story. If I buy a futures contract I have to literally hand over the money to a broker and I receive a contract. But if I somehow gain ownership of a timelocked utxo (see caveat at the start), I have something slightly different. Can if I borrow against it and gain independent value from it while it is locked? I thought about this but the picture appears to be very muddy. So, can I? What do you think? :)

Maybe it's more like a secured repo. But repos and futures are always traded on margin, and you're describing more like a spot market for the repos themselves trading freely.

Are there any Spanish speaking folks here who like reading and bitcoin and want to help me out for some sats? I need someone to compare 2 versions of a translation to determine their quality.

My Bitaxe is doing 500GH/s and pays 70 sats per day via Lightning. A bit lower than what I expected but still feels good to contribute

My nodl ran out of storage and will be repurposing the hardware.

Now running core on a old Dell desktop and syncing Fulcrum. I love the flexibility this gives me. Setting it up was a breeze. Pre built nodes are overrated!

Morning Nostr. What's the best client for desktop nostr with multi-accounts?

a lot of people miss that Nostr isn't just another social media platform. There are so many possibilities.

nostr:note1d6aehu8nfxchmdqny7v583xqv0vqd8y54epf3a9364dudx664c2qn4w4k9