It must be both, if something isn't property then it is useless as money because no one would want to receive it for their goods/services.
It's p2p cash because you can transact said property without 3rd party paper, that's a nightmare for the state
Discussion
I would agree it’s both, however the push for property ONLY is suspicious and benefits the system as is.
If #bitcoin was used as intended, a cash system, the US dollar would lose relevancy from what I can tell.
Property is important but a digital cash system where person A can send value to person B over the internet without a middle man is what’s most important imo.
What am I missing?
I don't think you're missing anything, it's no coincidence that bitcoin as MoE being bad for the state means lots of high-profile people are going to gaslight us in saying it's not meant for that.
That's why it's important we keep making Lightning better and shame the fake Bitcoiners shilling ECash for a paycheck.
Like you said, “a nightmare for the state”