Yea, an agenda to put us in a digital prison. RealID, biometics to travel, biometrics to leave or return to the US. Trllions in debt. More wars. Gave Palantir access to ALL our data. ICE is using the same facial recognotion software that was used to hunt down J6 protesters. He is surrounded by the tech billionaires who view us a a source of data, not as humans. He has a Soros affiliate running Treasury. What could Kalama have done that is possibly worse than that? She wouldnt have gotten anything done she is retarded. If he was a threat, he wouldnt be in office its that simple
Discussion
Everything you say presumes an omnipotent regime. I’m saying they are NOT omnipotent, people they don’t like CAN get into power. Will Trump do everything you’re saying? It’s possible. But it’s also possible that’s not what’s happening.
If Kamala had won, they would have tried to go after people for free speech. Europe would have followed suit all-in rather than having to fight with Trump. The scoldy woke douchebags who presume they’re better than you based on who they vote for and who you vote for (or didn’t vote for) would be staffing every layer of government. We’d be living in an HR department-like nanny state.
The reason we know this is that Kamala isn’t a person with an agenda. She’s just an apparatchik who does what she’s told, and what’s she’s told would be more of the last five years of hell.
Trump is trying to suppress speech. His anti-semistism EO, Bondi wanting hate speech laws. What rock are you living under? Everything people claimed Kamala would do is being done by Trump. Wake the hell up.
What rock are YOU living under? Bondi had to walk that shit back within hours! The anti-semitism shit IS bad, I won’t argue that. But the prior admin literally had a “disinformation bureau” and never walked ANYTHING back. I’m critical of Trump all the time, but the idea there’s no difference, it’s all the same thing is just not credible to me.
That she said it is more than enough. They are targetting speech. That is a fact.
no, they’re really not with that one exception. We’d be Keir Starmer’s UK if Kamala had won.
And a person's covid would have been worse without the jab. You are making the same, unprovable, claim. Doesnt matter what might have happened. What matters is what is happening. And he is going after speech.
That’s a poor analogy. You SHOULD be critical of Trump. More criticism = more pressure to back off. But the idea that it’s just as bad as the prior regime re speech is just not remotely credible IMO.
Well I guess its better to be stabbed that it is be shot then. Evil is evil. Tyranny is tyranny. The degree of either is irrelevant and what might have happened with Kamala has zero relevance. What IS happening is the only thing that matters. You're are cheering on all of our enslavement. But at least its not Kamala. A digital prison is a digital prison. Dont matter who is doing it.