What context does that add that wasn't added before from the mordinals github link I shared?
Context on the "no spam" thing: https://monero.observer/monero-punks-inscribes-first-nft-collection-monero/
Discussion
It has a neat timeline. Everything happened so quickly
The point is: it's easier to do in a smaller community where there's more lenience with the development team.
That's shown in the github link as well since the development team of Mordinals themselves lost interest, 2 years ago they left it abandoned, but no one lost interest in transacting on the network since it continued growing without spam
Sure. After the reactions from the network and the fact that: "shitcoins on monero" doesn't have nearly the same market as "shitcoins on bitcoin", I would abandon it too.
My point is that pretending that if monero had the same size (and perhaps expressibility) as Bitcoin, things would be better. I just think this is wishful thinking.
Depending on who you ask they may see a better market for "shitcoins on monero" than "shitcoins on bitcoin" since they also get the privacy features, someone even forked monero to create a shitcoin for shitcoins on monero (zano)
But of course it's a smaller network my point is it's still neat how the tx volume and the node count are so high while keeping it monetary mainly, that means every transfer is an uncensorable, untraceable, self sovereign money transmission