It sounds like there is a specific grievance here. For someone with no dog in this fight, it’s hard for me to take away much from your post except that you are unhappy. Perhaps if you were less vague and general in your criticism your post might be more productive towards improving the situation.
nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f Opensats has a kind of arrogance and contempt for developers. The board of directors will not listen to any suggestions. The essence of the problem is that most of the Opensats board of directors and funds are part-time. They think they are doing public welfare work and don't owe anyone. The duties of Opensats are only a small part of their daily work. For Nostr developers who are in urgent need of development funds, the projects they develop are their everything. Opensats is the only source of funding for most Nostr developers.
They don't care about the long and inefficient project review time and the unfairness of the rules. They only need to donate a few well-known Nostr clients to shut everyone up. As long as Opensats can operate for a long time, it is a good and bright resume for them. They don't care whether Jack's funds can be used efficiently or whether Nostr can develop quickly. Nostr developers develop quickly after getting the funds quickly. This is also one of the reasons why Nostr develops slowly.
Many developers come because of nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m 's call, because Jack has long-term funding for developers and is willing to continue to invest time and money in Nostr. But they will leave because of disappointment. nostr:note1cgyukak2c0lpzyvsdveq8fpvypf7gxtac9u7nl3kn59quymgmfhqmny3xy
Discussion
No replies yet.