I wish you hadn't, but it is not surprising. Just the one? Zero concerns about any findings since? Plasmids? Mechanism of action for the antibody to enter the lungs? I'm sure you've done all your due diligence here so I'd love to hear your take on it, doc.

I have a number of friends and clients who are doctors, who own private practices or who employ other doctors, so I have discussed a lot of this with them at length. Most curious is that the majority paid to be added to the database without taking any shots. Many of their colleagues to this day are aware of what has been going on, but the pay is too good and they won't say anything because they won't risk their jobs. This isn't an assumption, this is directly what I have been told by friends and clients alike, sharing their experiences and frustrations with these people, with me.

Were legitimate prophylactics and treatments suppressed? Why do you think people were already too sick once you were able to treat them? Is it perhaps they were told to stay home and do nothing until it was too late? Was and data mispresented and manipulated? Were claims of the severity of whatever was going on exaggerated at any point? Were tests and protocols poorly designed? Have datasets omitted certain factors to further a narrative?

Hiding behind a title and trying to dismiss the many issues centred around these claims isn't going to win us over.