Replying to Avatar bomboriver

got it. we are talking of the same thing just different terminology. got your point i understand it. so if you don't create those 10 addresses ... privacy is gone. that is why those mixers exist ( samourai wallets used it )

so btc miss this mixer capacity in its core protocol.
Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

i think you need to start by studying what a utxo is and how they work.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
bomboriver 1y ago

grazie!!

Avatar
daniele 1y ago

The terminology was not perfect but the request was really clear and make sense.

I would just let you notice that you repeated 8 (eight!) times in different messages that he misunderstood and have to study, missing the opportunity to be of real help.

C'mon, a little more kindness.

Was it bad day? :)

Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

I believe I was of real help and I do not believe I was at all unkind.

Avatar
bomboriver 1y ago

no i never said you were unkind. very helpful. i used the wrong terms.

Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

You missed a message from someone else who claimed I was unkind to you in my responses. I was replying to him.

Avatar
bomboriver 1y ago

i understand that with bitcoin if for laziness you use the wrong terms might be confusing. 👍

still my observation remain that privacy is a concern for bitcoin give the huge attacks we get on our privacy.

Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

Bitcoin with privacy would be great, but that's not how it works. Bitcoin will have to survive without privacy

Avatar
bomboriver 1y ago

bitcoin is tech. will have to evolve at some point. i think

Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

privacy at the protocol level is almost certainly never going to happen. That ship has sailed. Privacy, if we ever get it, will be dealt with by a regulatory and legal fight and implemented in 2nd layers like mixers.