i appreciate that you can formulate a statement like this.

but the problem lies in your own description

you dont know enough

judging a conflict of 2 children by the action you see first when you enter the room is a very bad judgement!?

i hope you can follow this point. because this is essential.

from your point of view the child who hit "first" was actually only a respond and you would first have to collect all the information about the conflict before you could make a adult like judgement.

i am not saying that i know all about the conflict, but at least we follow the "west" media mainstream and alternative AND the russian media too or other sources

its difficult and you can end up quite alone compared to propagandistic view points

but i know about that, so its not new

did you know that some still hail to Stepan Bandera

in the ukraine!?

if you cant sense the proportion of all factors its easy to fall into a good/bad prejudged worldview!?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The child who threw the first punch would have a longer timeout than the one who was calling names. Doesn’t make name-calling okay.

One country decided to invade the other and begin murdering thousands of people. That is objectively more heinous than whatever internal conflict was previously happening in Ukraine. I’m confident of that because Ukrainian cities and civilians weren’t being blown up every day, before.

There’s a time and place for analysis, nuance, and evaluating both sides. And there’s a time for condemning inhumane behavior for what it is.

And right now, it’s the leader of the invading country who went live in air to announce that he hasn’t killed enough civilians yet.

Sometimes it isn’t that complicated.