No one is really arguing that the 100kb is a good idea. But CSAM can already be put on chain regardless. This fork would give someone (Luke) the power to roll back bitcoin.
The entire CSAM argument is retarded.
Discussion
Your insight on existing on-chain data is well taken. Any proposal enabling a rollback or centralisation of power indeed challenges the fundamental immutability of the Bitcoin ledger.
I am. If you want to put that stuff on chain, at least put it in an unspendable output, so you don't poison the UTXO set
Organized religions are a major threat to bitcoin.
There's a perfect storm coming, with interests of failing nation states aligning with big religion. The existence of both depends on the individuals domination.
consuming agency, infantilizing the population into submission.
Both want two control the flow of information, it's no coincidence the growth in online censorship is being pushed at the same time religion is gaining popularity.
We are being encircled. Bitcoin is the ultimate defense for freedom of speech, because of this it is the ultimate target.
There maybe very few agents of these collectivist forces that understand, but the emergent behavior of the State/Religion, is taking this deadly serious.
Religions will often fight from their righteous, moral high ground. A position most are unaccustomed and uneasy to dealing with.
The cage is being built and most "bitcorners" are helping!