Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar ΛM

There are modern customs like having everything rented, having everything “Uberized” (which is very good, I have nothing against it, it is not even morally bad, nothing happens). Now, the idea that we have nothing, that we live from day to day, that everything is borrowed and that we have nothing of our own leads to very fickle societies. The proletariat, when Marx defines it, is one that has nothing but offspring. That is why it is a revolutionary class. I believe that people, apart from their family, should have their things, their property, because it also leads to a certain social stability. That you have something to lose, that you have your things. A society where nothing belongs to anyone, where everything is rented, what does it have to lose? They are very unstable societies.

Miguel Anxo Bastos

#grownostr #freedom #ANCAP

Avatar
Prisoner24601 1y ago

Agreed, although, for us to rent it then SOMEONE owns it. The would-be overlords in a neo-quasi-feudal system. Marxism has been, from very early on, just a useful fantasy and quasi-religion for those maniacs to leverage in order to gain and maintain power. Property is inherent, starting with our bodies. To pretend it doesn't exist is to deny observable reality.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.