Mostly it’s a process of sketching, prompting Stable Diffusion in image-to-image and then digital painting over outputs and going back and iterating. Anything I’ve put out here has been through several iterative transformations. It’s still a lot of work to get something good. I’m ready to share about 1% of the images I make.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Interesting.

It’s honestly a pretty interesting way of unifying a multimedia approach, and as animation and video become more approachable,…I can just imagine.

My Midjurney Results. Nice to look at but I wanted a seahorse and not a pregnant plant:) Not that easy to get what you want from AI.

Agreed. Even the art club was a bit rogue.

💜 these are gorgeous, but yeah, getting control of your own vision takes some input from you beyond the text prompts for sure. Does Midjourney provide a way to do that? I haven’t really dug into it.

I fed very long and detailed texts with depth of field and 3 D details etc.. If and how Midjourney has developed beyond that, I can't tell you. I don’t want to pay for it because I am into it too :)

Midjourney missing a massive trick with its payment structure. So many of my students and others would be using it right now and playing to create more work and more interesting prompts.

Stable Diffusion is a very fun and flexible and maddening tool, and it’s free (as long as you have a powerful GPU which is decidedly NOT free! —and time, LOTS of time, also NOT free!)

Nothing for free then? 😂

‘tis the rule

Oh sorry, I meant to write „I am *in it too . What I'm saying ( in tired d-english) is that I don't pay for my own input. Equally absurd is to pay Chat GPT fed by all of us humans ( and also via the Twitter API..). No way. 🤑

Wowza 🤯