What’s the next “oops, fluoride probably doesn’t belong as an additive to drinking water “? And why are we not using ML to investigate every single published paper for flaws?
Discussion
I read "breaking news" recently that ScIeNtIsTS believe the spikes in sudden deaths in young people may be related to the covid vax 😳
The whole "peer reviewed literature" scene is a scam!
Did something come out I missed?
There's a court case in the US where the plaintiffs are suing the EPA for not regulating fluoride added to drinking water. I think this is the second such case, but there was a recent ish bipartisan law passed that puts the plaintiff at higher odds of success if they present their case well. Typically these cases are stacked for the government agency being sued (must prove the agency is acting in an arbitrary or capricious manner), the new law means they only have to successfully prove fluoride has potential to cause health damages and the judge could force the EPA to look closer at fluoride or he could order them to ban adding it to water supplies altogether.
A good start would be to have an AI audit PubMed and flag every study that was paid for by commercial interests such as Big Food/Ag/Pharma.