Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Constant

I don't think people realize the point. I did a podcast with fiatjaf about open time stamps, when he was busy writing the implementation, and it was only during that conversation when i explained that he realized why its important, lol. I just re-listened it to see if it was worth sharing it with you, but i think you are better off with my wall of text haha.

Anyway the point was context; some old book, is physically an old book; but data is just data, it has no smell etc. So, especially in the age of A.I., you can not only conjure up data, but also a whole bunch of fake context surrounding that data. So something pretending to be very old, might as well be created mere minutes ago, including its surrounding conversation; and when over time a large quantity of keys get compromized and public knowledge the mess only becomes greater. We are better off just structurally timestamping all the things, future historians will thank us for adding some smell to the data.

Avatar
eidos 2w ago 💬 1

What OTS and Nostr show isn’t just that something existed at a certain time.

Once you can prove existence and authorship without relying on a trusted party, the same mechanism applies to later changes: updates, commentary, or even walking away.

Proof-of-creation is probably just the first step.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Constant 2w ago

nostr:npub1urzhcd9sw3qesy9lfy73zeuy0w90zlx295x2un3x7ad52quxyvjqeuja29

Thread collapsed