I have never once had an issue searching for and finding a podcast I was looking for, lol. Why do devs like to make up user issues that don’t exist?
Discussion
Status quo bias affects everybody, but some more than others.
Bikeshedding is a favorite pastime of all devs, but some more than others.
I have. It feels like all searches everywhere have pretty much been broken in some form or fashion for many years.
Strange that we’ve had such opposite experiences, lol. Maybe the people creating the podcasts you’re looking for don’t know how to use existing tools for publishing? Seems to work pretty well. If nostr can improve something, then sure why not do it? But all this acting like it’s absolutely completely broken currently is nonsense.
Rugpulls are inevitably coming and nostr could provide better discovery for the episodes as well as highlights of episodes and comments/zaps/likes/transcriptions etc.
E.g. Blossom could help with more robust storage(on multiple servers possibly, indexed with hash of file signed with nostr pubkey), while referring to them with nostr native entities that could enable a host of features you could only dream of so far:
- Viral sharing of sections/highlights
- DVM transcriptions / translations / summaries of whole episodes or parts
- Curated shareable lists of highlights in a topic (from tags)
- View your friends opinions on all of this and post your own while filtering spam using #wot
- ...
What if I could easily send you a mashup of all #v4v related nostr pod content of the past 6 months?
#DVM -s could do the audio or transcription processing, returning tagged sections in a list, pointing to blossom server files or even one file that the dvm created as the final product. Then we would have a discussion about it and perhaps if we are interested, could dive in the whole pod because the part's refer to whole episodes.
... and our exchange and all the great ideas that came up are there even after 10 years.
I would love sth like this.