https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VwMzNE1D3so&pp=ygUOQ2hhdW1pYW4gbWludHM%3D

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Is that the case? I conceived it as chuckle cheese tokens... sure I can try to give you a chuckle cheese token at the farmers market, but it is only redeemable at chuckle cheese

Sounds like what I was describing. But, why would I want to accept what is basically a receipt for a certain amount of bitcoin when I can just receive the underlying bitcoin itself

It’s your choice. You could receive a fedimint payment to your own federation, to your Lightning node, or you could swap from Lightning to base chain.

Why keep it in a fedimint?

You don’t have to manage a Lightning node.

You get more privacy than just using Lightning.

If you’re nontechnical, then a federation of trusted people can manage your keys for you (and potentially restore your access if you “forget your password”).

Like lightning, it will likely also be cheaper to use a fedimint than to transact on the base chain.

If you don't want to receive federated sats, you just present a regular LN invoice. The LSPs from the federation will accept the Fedi tokens & pay you in sats via lightning.

If you're paying someone in a federation, they present a federated lightning invoice. The LSPs send that user Fedi tokens when you pay the lightning invoice.

If you're a sovereign LN user, you're not impacted at all.

You are convoluting terms... no such thing as *federated satoshis* it is a receipt for a set amount of satoshis from a federation. Of course the problem with federations, side chains, drive chains, space chains, ect. Is always the pegging out back to actual satoshis. You are trusting entities to perform a function on your behalf in a timely manner. The only way that works is inside the same entity... I have zero trust for anyone who is not me. To my eyes the cost of introducing new counterparties and the complexity of fedimints is not worth the miniscule cost savings.