Money is not a tool in that way. It isn’t a sword, it’s a *communication tool,* people are social creatures, and they rely on communication with others to understand how others relate to their lives and time. When that communication becomes a lie, it should be obvious that they will react incorrectly if they have incorrect information.

You seem to fail to understand that money is one of the very few layers *below* culture in the societal stack, because money is a prerequisite to scaling beyond small tribes and families. In those small environments culture can be more reliant on trust, but at the scale of millions, our only option is to rely on money to signal values, because our other communication systems can’t scale or account for that depth of information.

It’s everything to do with incentives. None of this absolves the individual, but pretending that society can just ignore fundamentally broken economic incentives is a fairy tale. It’s not possible, our environment defines our limitations and the pressures that guide us.

A kind of silly, but still apt analogy:

Imagine asking everyone a simple question and then getting them to signal the correct answer by going through door #1 or door #2.

But then you block the entrance to door #1 with barbed wire, and then had someone handing out free coffee and donuts at door #2. Then afterward getting angry at how many people selected the wrong answer.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Allow me to take advantage of our interaction here for a brief aside and to encourage you to debate Paul Storcz about DriveChains on the What Bitcoin Did podcast, as suggested by others on this twitter thread. https://twitter.com/Truthcoin/status/1695444426892439698

We will all be served by your keen, good faith mind taking him on (if you oppose) and at the least communicate its benefits/flaws to the general audience.

Please.

And do not take his tone or delivery personally, stick to ideas and facts he's a bit rough.

>The door 1 and 2 analogy.

I will work with your simplified analogy. You are claiming that once door 1 has barbed wires removed through Bitcoin, the right answer will be reached.

If i overstand correctly, Door 1 is a stand-in for all the good choices people could make if it were not for a state backed by bad fiat money.

Or you mean that the State itself blocking door 1 is payed for by bad fiat money, and that bitcoin allows it to be removed as an obstacle/become irrelevant, by virtue of its property as a gold like digital sound money.

You never mention why the state exists in the first place. Or how the problem it solves goes away with Bitcoin. Why or how does it abandon its barbed wire post infront of door 1 because of Bitcoin ? Or gold ? How does whatever replace it lead tonbetter mental health. Or if nothing replaces it (as in pure ancapistan) a classic monopoly/state just doesn't reform at door 1.

By your reasoning the State itself can be thought of as a technology or under-the-surface cultural tool that both communicates its values and traditions between large scale numbers of people in a societies, as much as the "signal of money" you mention, is.

I for one hope you are right, i hope the signal of Bitcoin is pure, like gold. I hope it can't be manipulated, like a real oz of 24c gold. I hope this purety, along with it's other properties fixes mental health, addicition and homelessness somehow. I hope these really are caused by bad money and not some necessary and essential part of mortal existence, transitory experience, and cultural cycle.

I will not be satisfied, though, until you strong optimist for Bitcoin admit the tempered optimist position that:

Bitcoin is something new, as yet unproven, and while supported by sound technology, game theory and economic principals, it remains to be shown that it will create a better-than-fiat world, or even a better world than the last sound money did, gold. The modern easy credit/fiat world can be argued was better than the "sound money" world of gold, in that it had available credit to waste on such things as military development of GPS, The Space program , ect.

My call to action is: Talk is cheap. Prove Bitcoin is better.

In the time bitcoin has been around, Tesla has gone from no cars to world wide adoption and delivery. Smartphones have changed everything. Dominoes went from shit pizza to hyper customized no click delivery. All under fiat.

We have lightning.....