The US Constitution is designed to centralize power in the federal government taking it away from the states.

The first charter for the US federal government was the Articles of Confederation and it created a much more severely limited government.

The first ten amendments, aka the bill of rights, were a compromise from the big government pro constitution group to get more of the small government people to switch sides.

They should have stuck to their principles and kept the articles of confederation.

All of this has somehow gone missing from most American history books. I'll let the reader decide if that was intentional.

nostr:nevent1qqsx9jvn3zzhl3za4a2m9zhvr0tfah0e9tjf4wajuqyffke0x8c99xgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqrqsqqqqqp5xt23c

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You a constitutional scholar or somethin?

Nope, just love a bit of history that destroys convenient narratives.

It'll be interesting to see how far things go in the next decade. People say "regulation is the enemy of capitalism" and then totally ignore the fact that they've been poisoned to death by corporations that have utterly destroyed regulation... Hey, do you know how much PFOA is in your blood? It isn't zero because every human alive has PFOA in their blood, but do you live somewhere that Dupont and Co. was able to dump extensively?

PFOAs are a case of every bad thing people say will happen without a government is already happening with a government.

When a company like DuPont can use the government as an extension squashing competition and covering up wrongdoing it isn't exactly capitalism. I also hope as an agorist that taking away the government as a tool would reduce or limit issues like PFOAs.

I can't say this makes sense to me. Regulators are fake, we knows this. Lobbyist dollars fuel nearly every regulatory body. So removing even the notion of regulation is what you think will prevent corporations from doing horrible shit? So you think legalizing murder will prevent murders? Or legalizing weed will stop people from smoking weed? Boy, I got news for you on that last one, lmao.

I don't expect a utopia, but I do think that taking away the government to look to as a parental trust figure will cause more individuals to rise to the occasion.

If people can't assume moral because legal they must do moral reasoning on their own in a distributed fashion.

Murders already illegal and still happens. Weed isn't immoral so most harm comes from government regulation. Issues like PFOAs are uniquely suited to legality preventing public whistleblowers from stepping up.

"Who enforced the law and judged cases before state bureaucrats took it over in the 1800s?" is a question I like to ask.

The Common Law is much older than nation-state bureaucracy.

I suspect it's not that interesting. We mostly learn wars and outcomes in school, not nitty gritty details.

The #Quash: The Arts of Confederation worked. That's why they HAD TO GO.

Media file: https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/fd185298-b79c-437d-a0d0-9450cf43d633/s2-ep46-ad-art-conf-vs-const.mp3