Oversimplified Summary: A US court agrees BitGo could not provide audited financial statements for 2021. They’re also buying Prime Trust which appears to have spectacularly failed for reasons no one will publicly admit.

Question: Why should I trust them or businesses that use them as a custodian? This makes me extremely hesitant to use them until a clear explanation is public. #[0]​ #[1]​ #[2]​ Care to comment?

This seems to reinforce the River, Cash App, and Strike model of insourcing the custodial piece. Maybe that’s a potential conflict of interest, but I’ll take a conflict over the “money gone” that just almost happened at Prime Trust and BitGo not being able to put together an audited financial statement with $1B on the line.

Frankly it’s frustrating that certain people seem to know the story, but won’t share. This is info people need to make intelligent decisions in the Bitcoin space. #bitcoin #plebchain

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Swan uses fortress now not prime trust or bitgo

My read of the Swan website is BitGo does the Bitcoin custody and fortress does the fiat custody. Hence why they are using two custodians. Open to correction if that’s in error.

Interesting, all I heard was Cory say they use fortress now

Meanwhile, KYC should have made everyone who cares about Bitcoin stop using them already.

Ditch the bank. Get your bitcoin the permissionless way:

https://bitcoiner.guide/nokyconly/

He’s talking about you Cory…