Damn. Of all the people in the world, why would #Simplex take funds from literally the most anti-privacy bunch like Zuck, Bill gates, etc.?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Taking money by itself would not worry me, but #SimpleX having to return it does.

Still, SimpleX by itself is supposed to be a protocol, isn't it?

Sketch for sure. But the protocol is open source and you can run your own simplex server built from scratch. Also the fact that you can spin up usernames not tied to even an email address is impressive. Curious, what exactly outside of this money item concerns you ( if any) ?

Nah, just the money for now. For a product that is fighting against anti-privacy it doesn’t sound good getting invested by those very entities. Also majority of the crowd are just going to use it as is not run their own servers, just saying.

Facts, 🤙

Yeah that'll be another pass for me.

I still like Briar as a base chat app tbh thanks to its mesh networking capacity.

nostr:nevent1qqsw5gxxvxn4wj4u60a0hweyxs96rpa90m7k8g2jv7q3xa2jzq9rznqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyqj6a2q7m8nprzxcutlc6u0m4sa5w7jaeargzqv88we8d0funnrdwqcyqqqqqqg0ve59m

Take a look at xmpp, it's the best open chat protocol that exists since 1999. WhatsApp, Facebook, Google, signal they all use it. They can implement simplex too and NPCs will use their closed version. I use xmpp on my server, and anybody can do it, but who wants to pay the price of freedom?

True, but simplex needs the test of time yet.

This comparison isn't true 👉xmpp