It certainly takes persistence to decode the gibberish. One thing to keep in mind is, there are a lot of different things calling themselves "gnostic," and they have very little in common with each other. Yes, the cream in the middle is something you have to get yourself. That's actual gnosis, or knowledge. Knowledge of what? That's the thing. That's why I go on about reality being different from perceived reality. That's just logic, and even knowing that isn't gnosis. Gnosis is fleeting, like when God showed only a tiny part of himself to Moses. That's allegory for what I'm describing. But no amount of description can transmit it.

I think this is what this teacher you shared is building to.

And that's why Christianity can only ever amount to a game of telephone. Its not bad to play, but they are prideful when they assert that their way is The Way or the Only way. That's just wrong. Its only guaranteed Not to be the way. And its biblically wrong, too. Jesus said "No one comes to the Father except through me," but that is grossly misinterpreted, and grossly conflated with the church. Church is a place of faith, or supposed to be, but they don't even know what faith is, so they do exactly the opposite of faith and assert themselves over others, who they are supposed to view as brothers and sisters. There's no pride in faith. That's impossible. So if there's pride, there's no faith.

This, I think, is why gnosis usually happens in moments of crisis, such as death. In such moments, you drop your pride. You drop yourself. With yourself out of your way, you can experience a dose of reality. But if you're going to survive and tell anyone about it, "you-ness" has to return. That's why God told Moses he would die if he saw any more. That's also why Zeus told whats-her-face she'd die if she saw Zeus' true form, and then he had to carry Dionysus in his thigh. Different traditions, same meaning.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It all comes around in the great conversation.

He talks about the mind creating the brain or the brain creating the mind in one video. Materialism for idiots is very clear on this, but they are wrong.

Keep digging and once you have meditated enough to have no head you'll see that there is another level where the nomena, phenomena thing is still absolutely true of your experience even if there is nothing supernatural out there.

If everything is supernatural, then nothing is. And everything is. So everything is just natural. The only difference is whether you know that you know nothing, or not.

But in another sense since my entire world is inside me I know everything always.

Then what's the next thing I'll say?

Why would I worry about that? You are just a hallucination.

Technically correct, but this hallucination is still asking. And you're a hallucination too.

Ask what someones favorite movie is, then wait for them to forget and ask again. You'll likely get a different answer even though both are movies they saw before the first time you asked. It works for foods, bands, whatever.

Careful observation and investigation of your internal experience shows you can't know what you are going to say until you say it.

In the same way I can't know what a hallucination inside me will say until it is said.

With all that in place you'll be able to see that you subtly swapped "share existing knowledge with me" for "predict the future." Those are very different questions. If I could do the 2nd I'd be day trading right now not talking to myself on the internet.

You're contradicting yourself.

nostr:nevent1qqsf0yvgh8vefap7fknznqywt376qnkeqpcwcqs9wx6v6fhktgcg9lgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsygqpphcvjj87n2656t9hafpql7sg64u43xqmd6ngaqa25l4jm5lstgpsgqqqqqqs8nhk7a

My point is only that subjective experience and objective reality both exist. They're not either/or. The whole world exists inside you, but define "you," define, "world." Recognizing the pattern doesn't mean your segment of it becomes preeminent.

Now, to contradict myself while returning yo your most recent points, you actually can know basically what next thing another person will say or do or even randomly be subjected to. Not the specifics, but the outline. If you read Campbell's "hero with ten thousand faces," or learn to read tarot, you'll see something of the pattern. You can do this without the tiniest ability to do psychic shit, if that's even real. I started by wanting to know how to write a good story - that's an ongoing project. But the writing is a sideshow. The real deal is basically hermetic, though I think that looks like nonsense if you approach it directly.

I don't think it's a contradiction to draw a line between knowing what is and knowing what will be.

I'm familiar with Campbell. I know that I am the hero. I also know that all my hallucinations all think they are the hero too. That allows me to constrain the space of predictions but not perfect precision.

That's nihilism. Those aren't your hallucinations. They're their own hallucinations. Maybe they're "you," but on this side of veil, it doesn't matter.

Nihilism is concluding meaninglessness. I concluded that it does matter, it is the only and most important thing in the world.

There is nothing in my experience that allows me to actually confirm you are a separate entity. Schizophrenics know this is true.

In the event that something in the nomena corresponds to you, then I am also a hallucination inside your experience. Since I can only observe the nomena through a glass darkly I treat it like an unknowable.

Mostly it shades to you being entirely a hallucination because I can't know you exist in the nomena AND any knowledge I have of that being in the nomena is filtered through my hallucinations.

You can't observe noumena at all, and that's the point of the distinction between noumema and phenomena. That's why I'm a legit hallucination for both you and me, as are you. How could anything in noumema correspond to anything, if all noumena are filtered through phenomena? Correspondences do occur, but they're only observable effect of the real thing which is unobservable ; two sides of that dark glass/mirror..

Solipsism is nihilistic because it makes the jump from "I can know" to "therefore I'm all there is," which is an unjustifiable jump, and if you're all there is, and bad things happen despite you wishing they didn't, then you must be powerless - but it doesn't make sense that you can be powerless and God at the same time. If you zoom out and say we're all part of one fabric, then that might be true, and even seems to be, but its entirely pointless. You're back to the original position of being an individual. And I suspect that's what you're driving at - that teacher you shared was very against the concept of individuality.

He is, but I never said I agreed with EVERYTHING he said. I only told you he was interesting and made me think of you. I do agree with a lot of what he says. Luckily he doesn't test and doesn't expect students to agree with him to pass.

Fabric is one way of looking at it. Subtle difference from may way but same end result. I wouldn't harm you because harming a hallucination inside my head I would be self harm. Better to drive at growth and positive sum interactions with the part of myself that is you.

I don't don't think I'm powerless, there is a wide gap between there and all powerful. I'm somewhere in between. In addition to that I exist in the nomena which I have imperfect knowledge of, though I have perfect knowledge of phenomena. My imperfect knowledge of nomena means that I cannot always affect the nomena in the way that I want even if I were all powerful.

Note that you also have perfect knowledge of phenomena, even though we have different and conflicting knowledge. We each have a unique and separate phenomena. This is not moral relativism. True morals are something in nomena that we both have only imperfect access to.

Yeah I liked that he doesn't test. It seems right for a class like that.

This has been fun. I should disclose, I picked that position on a whim because I thought it would be fun to defend and I knew you'd be up for talking about it.

Educational to play devils advocate for a bit but I don't have the time to keep going right now.

This conversation has brightened my days and stretched my mind and I appreciate it.

That's the fattest zap I've ever received. I feel the same way, so I'll send it back like a virtual handshake.

And I admit my position kinda evolved as we went. It was educational for me. So... Thanks.

I definitely had to think and evolve along the way.