Honestly I’d hit him with 69 sats if he asked for it on Nostr. It’s hard to understand Bitcoin when you’re retarded. It’s for charity.
Discussion
sometimes you gotta zap people you disagree, not because you agree with them, but because their content shows proof of work or is valueable to others.
I mean he generated a wallet address. That shows growth.
He’s done this before and lost the keys
Read this out of context and first agreed, then thought hang on, probably in this case (I mean in general, not commenting on the OP) it would be better to comment with an appreciation for the proof of work, along with a statement about why one does not agree.
This is because zapping, at least the way I see it, indicates agreement at a glance, and could be misleading if there are many zaps ‘for the appreciation of proof of work’ while disagreeing with the content.
Curious to hear your thoughts
You have to zap both if you agree and if it's an interesting content with which you don't agree! You have to appreciate the proof of work in any case😉
Very good point, Derek. It‘s called respect.