The Public Watching NASA Space Cartoons
Did you know that there is not one single raw photograph of planet Earth in existence? ALL of the ones we were shown in school, textbooks, the movies, etc. are photoshopped and/or CGI manipulated.
Kinda weird, right? https://blossom.primal.net/6b712177fb83721a3a6a7f95940a472cfbd4cebec30e3c2f757e74b549d235df.3gp
Yep. Kinda odd.
Doesn't mean the earth is flat.
Just means we really didn't go to the moon and we have technology of ants.
I guess thats ok then
Those who knew knew and they not speak of it cause it mean them against the whole nation worldwide .
Just enjoyed life , protect and sustained our family.
It is not worth the effort to talk space cartoon .
Yeah, makes sense. Someone who is part of a cult, needs to want to leave themself.
it is not for you to judge . if you have courage enough , you can start posting with real name and picture and speak of what you dislike about some group .
I am not interested to attack others. I am interested in sharing the truth about our reality. No one needs to be attacked as people can verify things for themself, thats why its called truth. ie. rockets dont work in a vacuum, water at rest always finds its level, the motion of the earth is an upward vector (not down or spinning). This is all testable and can be verified yourself without attacking others.
We have been conned. If you realize the level of misdirection to fake the moon landing, what makes you so sure they wouldnβt go one step further and push the globe model?
Flat or round. I'm still stuck here paying bills and do are you.
My bills are flat and yours are round, so I owe less than you :)
Apollo 8, Hasselblad 500 EL 250mm, Kodak Ektachrome 220, 1/250s at f11...24 Dec1968 1639z
Looks fake
so do many things that humans rarely if ever see...ever seen a totality during a solar eclipse?
I didnt see that. But you can load this image into Photoshop and see in 2 seconds its fake. http://blossom.happytavern.co/54f5dae483134a1c4bec3d83aac80aae18070485e5c0d93a82d8341b7ad87a76
No stars
Ektachrome at 1/250s and f11....try photographing stars with that setting - or even with a digital camera...stars are many orders of magnitude dimmer than the moon and earth in full sunlight, flim or digital photography don't have the dynamic range to show both at the same time. To properly expose for stars you need many seconds of exposure, and a tripod with a motorized equatorial mount (or high ISO film that will be less resolution)
just some quick calculations, with Ektachrome (iso 100) and shooting at f11, you would need 120-240 seconds (2-4 MINUTES) of exposure to properly expose the stars....vs 1/250s (4 milliseconds) this exposure was shot at
There's nothing in the space vacuum to get lit by the sun. What "full sunlight" are you talking about?
Stars around the moon are easily seen at night from earth, while it sits in "full sunlight" in space, allegedly.
On the inverse square law in regards to light:
https://odysee.com/@GLOBEBUSTERS:c/globebusters-bob-knodel-2019-feic:1
really? you can see stars around a full moon? maybe the very brightest, maybe -- now take a picture - photography does not have the dynamic range of a human eye
My shit phone camera can't even make a good moon photo, imagine Nasa giving such an excuse for a cool $90-100 million a day budget.
You can see a lot of stars during a full moon, outside of the cities tho. Nothing like the empty blackness Nasa has been pushing as space photos for decades.
I've shot a broad range of film (including Ekta) and digital, including some astrophotography and 2 solar eclipse totalities. You can accept the knowledge I'm offering, go out and test it, or take the blue pill continue to believe what you want to.
I shall, intrigued.
Blue pill is the mainstream pill, tho. Moon landings were all faked, you have missed the 90s leaks of Nasa footage staging "deep space" photo of earth during supposed moon missions, with the A-team of masons-astroNOTs.
We are born into mind control many generations ago... But once to see the mind control, you can't unsee it. The question is if someone is willing to look, or if they will fight against lifting the veil.
