Avatar
🦊🔫🥩🏴‍☠️⚡
c074ef91848c1d74a8639c82a1cdf73722b688472fc120843a23954a7c8b75d0
Low EQ troll, deplorable, dangerous, extremist, eclipsophile, Fiat slave.

slightly more controlled and surveilled? If it is turned off or barely spendable, even normies won't use it. Venezuelans would rather use cinder blocks as money than bolivars - if it can't be used as money, it won't be

Replying to Avatar Nick Anthony

I guess there are no days off. The latest in ECB CBDC marketing is a Christmas post from president Christine Lagarde.

To be honest, I would have preferred coal, but here we are... so let me put down the eggnog and break down what's happening here.

As she noted, the EU Governing Council has given the green light for the digital euro (the ECB's CBDC). In short, the Council said that the digital euro should work both online and offline, have holding limits, allow a "high degree of privacy" while still being AML/KYC compliant, and be free for consumers to use.

This green light from the council does not mean, however, that the digital euro will be launched. Now it's up to the European Parliament to weigh in.

Sadly, though, this process might appear democratic from the outside, but it's really just a formality. It's unlikely that Parliament will alter the course.

As nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqdg6es53r3hys9tk3n7aldgz4lx4ly8qu4zg468zwyl6smuhjjrvsm58xhx noted on X, the ECB is just waiting for the Parliament's rubber stamp to move forward.

As CBDC marketing ramps up, it's important to be vigiliant (even on holidays).

As I've noted repeatedly, the ECB's marketing campaign borders on false advertising when it comes to claims about competition and freedom.

https://www.cato.org/blog/digital-euro-isnt-about-freedom

2026 is going to be an eventful year on the CBDC front. And as always, you can find out everything you need to know in the nostr:nprofile1qyf8wumn8ghj7cnfw3ehgctrdvhxzursqythwumn8ghj7cmp9ehhyctwvajhq6tvdshxgetkqqs0rxy6jmt44guxkny8z4pkym9mxckqxfytygxuntjn6l80hj409sggjrzcm CBDC Tracker.

https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/home

such a nothing burger....we already use defacto CBDCs, in the form of fiat banking cuckbucks

Replying to Avatar Proof Of Dad

I used to get trapped in town between breakfast and lunch way too often. Bored, hungry, and surrounded by temptation, I’d make the classic “poor food choices” (you know, the ones that whisper “it’s just one burger” while quietly adding another notch to my belt).

Then one week, I escaped to the mountains for some hiking. I packed a bunch of MET-Rx bars for lunch—nothing fancy, just convenient protein bricks. After 4-5 days of fresh air and those bars, I stepped on the scale back home and… holy crap, I was down a few pounds! No starvation, no misery—just bars and walking.

So naturally, I did what any rational human would do: I sprinted to Amazon and panic-bought a lifetime supply of these “miracle bars.”

Fast-forward: I started replacing lunch (and the occasional dinner) with one of these bad boys. Sometimes I’d pair it with a glass of milk for a 40g+ protein flex. And guess what? The weight kept melting off like ice cream on a summer sidewalk. Bonus: my wallet got thicker while my waist got thinner.

Moral of the story? 99% of the food options in town are basically edible sabotage—designed to taste amazing and make you buy bigger pants. But little tweaks can trigger massive wins.

If you’re stuck in the weight-gain loop, try something new! Your body is a puzzle, not a vending machine—there’s no magic “easy” button, but there are smart buttons. Hit one. Mine happened to be delicious and called MET-Rx.

You got this. One small change, one ridiculous victory at a time. 💪😄

I know it’s not steak 🥩 and eggs 🥚 and highly processed but it work for now.

* Milk choice should be one with the most protein and least sugar not all milk is created equal

eat fatty red meat, won't get hungry

Replying to Avatar Minz

I was thinking about the future of photography, esp with all the features available in apps like ChatGPT, Grok aso.

Consider the photos in this post, with the Maiko (apprentice Geiko/Geisha). I made this in Kyoto. In the background of the original, you see some cars which I find distracting and not very pleasing. How easy it is to just have ChatGPT replace the car with some pine trees or the golden temple in Kyoto? Within seconds? I can have my photo made just to my liking.

So you could say why bother going out and shoot because it will be very difficult , if not impossible to make photos you make yourself look as good as those made or altered by AI, if you know how to give it the right prompts.

ChatGPT now also includes a connection to the Photoshop app that analyses your photo and makes suggestions on how to improve it with adjusting contrast, saturation, lights, shadows et cetera and it does a real good job. So why bother?

I guess it all comes down to the experience you are having and the excitement of being at the right place at the right time and capturing the scene.

I’ve often thought there is an element of hunting in photography, esp when capturing people or animals. Photography can be a sort of replacement for that feeling.

Only afterwards do I look at it again at home and maybe post it on here. And to be honest, I do appreciate the likes and reposts and of course the zaps. It feels like a validation.

So I guess there are two main experiences connected to photography: the excitement of the moment itself and then the experience you get when showing the result to others.

Making AI adjustments doesnt affect the first feeling. Either it was there or it was not.

So it affects only the moment showing it to others, not the high you get from clicking at the right time, capturing beauty.

That in itself is a reason to keep on shooting. AI will never be able to spoil that for me.

In post processing, even removing small distractions, like some litter on the foreground, I don’t have a problem with.

There are whole debates about this online though, for many it is considered ‘not done’.

So where is the line for me?

I guess removing a fundamental part (subject, total background or foreground) and including something that was not there, is where I draw the line.

Making changes like that takes away any satisfaction I might get from showing what I made to others. If that means i ‘lose’ to those that do make their photo’s ‘perfect’ this way, then so be it.

Let me know you thoughts on this!

HAVE A MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYBODY AND THANK YOU FOR APPRECIATING MY WORK!

#photography #AI

the lack of bokeh in them all is distracting....with a proper lens the background is almost irrelevant in portraits - I don't really "enjoy" post processing so I try to need as little of it as possible

like every democracy ever....only solution to that problem is no central government

so do many things that humans rarely if ever see...ever seen a totality during a solar eclipse?

most rational humans become calmer, and have very well regulated emotional control if they choose to be armed every day - there won't be emotional outbursts - if a situation arises, it is all about de-escalation, avoiding anything that could lead to even a minor altercation...

its why Bruce Banner does everything he can to avoid any situation that could lead to violence - he knows he will win, and someone will get hurt

not everyone is rational, but most people I deal with who chose to be armed, operate this way -

in that case then yeah , could have been someone that knows how to shoot and was aware that kirk was likely wearing armor - but as far as a "pro", why not just use a 338 LM or anything that can defeat armor and shoot center mass for a much better chance of success?

on such a short range shot, it takes a lot of wind - and doping the wind for a first round hit at much longer ranges isn't rocket science

there is almost no demand in the US for stablecoins...the only natural demand is for a very small niche of people to buy from sanctioned countries, and then its Tether on Tron - they aren't interoperable, which also almost eliminates their utility

as far as EO6102 on bitcoin or against Strategy, you give the flunkies in government far too much credit - none of them (at least the ones that matter) will see what is coming until it is already here, and they will simply be bewildered at how it happened

https://savagearms.com/firearms/model/110-precision

for a chassis rifle mostly, but you could get a hunting rifle and add a bipod and scope and still shoot 600m for $1k or less

https://savagearms.com/firearms/model/110-predator

you will want a heavier barrel if you plan on shooting strings more than 5 or so, the barrel needs to be more rigid and it will heat more slowly

OK to be skeptical, if you think it matters for bitcoin then therefore matters to you, do the work to understand it. If you understand bitcoin, you already have the prerequisite to understand strategy. If only 0.2℅ of the world understands that bitcoin is inevitable, but only 10% of bitcoiners understand strategy....there just may be an opportunity and information assymetry.

Here is a good intro to Strategy on the youtube.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uILb-qRPLGo&t=2180s&pp=2AGEEZACAQ%3D%3D

Dunkirk fell short in the air...the tactics were so blatantly wrong (and technical details like how much ammo a Spitfire can carry - 90% less than depicted!!!) it spoils the rest of the movie for me . Nolan seems so thorough on a lot of things, but at least hire a subject matter expert technical advisor! Bitcoin fixes this 😂