I don’t think monetization is an issue. I think the only thing preventing monetization like that is scale.

While we don’t know impression numbers on Nostr, you will get paid about $4-8 per million impressions on X.

Let’s take the upper range, $8/million impressions. On X, if you have 1.5 billion impressions in a month, you will make about $12,000 in revenue at $8/million impressions.

Now let’s look at Nostr. Let’s say 0.5% of people zap a post with 21 sats. This means that for 1 million impressions, you will have 5000 zaps, totaling 105,000 sats. 105 ksat is around $61. This means you would be paid around $61 per million impressions.

So, on Nostr, if you could pull in 1.5 billion impressions in a month, you would make around 157.5 Msat, or $91,300, if only 0.5% of viewers left a 21 sat zap.

That is 7.6x as much as you would make on X. We are so early to Nostr. The most zapped posts are probably only getting thousands of impressions. I feel that the zap rate would be much higher than 0.5%, but if it were only 0.1%, you would still make more than on X. Ad revenue on X is a joke.

Micropayments will destroy ad revenue based services. We will still see advertiser deals like you see on podcasts. Certain types of content, like videos, would see a higher rate of payment than simple tweet style posts.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Great work, you are right the incentives are here. The scale is needed.

We are so early, I think anybody who is active today on Nostr and remains active over the next 5-10 years will be major influencers on the network. It will snowball as adoption grows

Ok this makes me happy makes sense

I was wrong thank you for breaking it down for me.

i was just trying to help make things better as more money = better for everyone.

All we need is wider adoption, and the earning potential on nostr will be incredible